Why did the Aztecs lose?
The short answer is encapsulated in Jared Diamond’s pithy phrase Guns,
Germs and Steel. There was more to it
than that. Above Tenochtitlan, the Spanish had seen nothing like it.
Let me begin by saying Cortez never faced the full strength
of the Aztec Empire. Had he done so he
would have ended up stretched on the altar stone of the Great Temple. That he did not is down to a number of
factors, all of them Aztec related.
The Aztecs were not popular with their neighbours and
didn’t see any need to be. Consequently, when Cortez
arrived, he was able to recruit whole armies of non- Aztecs. All of them fully
committed to destroying the Aztec State.
Moctezuma (pictured above and below) equivocated on how to deal with the Spanish. He tried bribery, he tried proxy war, he
probably intended treachery. We should
understand that he would have been fully briefed on the Spanish, their
conduct and intentions.
Did he think they were returning gods? I doubt it. The correct response would have
been to mobilise everything he had and march on them. This he failed to do.
Fatally, he allowed Cortez into Tenochtitlan with his whole
army. It may be that he thought they would be easier destroyed there. Indeed, when it came to it the Spanish did
have a very hard time fighting in Tenochtitlan. They were driven out with heavy
casualties. By then it didn’t matter to Moctezuma
for he was dead.
There were consequences to Moctezuma decision.
First the Spanish immediately took him prisoner rendering
him a puppet Emperor.
Second deadly disease entered the city.
Third the Spanish took the occasion of a festival dance to
mass murder most of the unarmed Aztec officer class.
Fourth the Spanish found out that the Aztecs were rich
beyond dreams of avarice. Gold rich,
that is. Spanish motivation, never lacking,
abounded.
Moctezuma was killed during a riot either by the Spanish or
his own people. Once he was gone the
Aztecs rose against the Spanish. Let us
now consider how they stood.
They needed a new Emperor and got one, Cuitláhuac,
unfortunately he was already infected with small pox. He reigned a short time and
died. Before doing so he presumably set
the resistance in motion. The Aztecs were to have a succession problem.
His successor was Cuauhtemoc a thoroughly able man. Today
he is a Mexican national hero. Moctezuma by comparison seems mainly to be associated with
stomach disorders.
The Aztec military assembled. Most of its leadership was dead. All ranks
were sick or shortly to be so. Key allies decided to sit it out. It was not the army Moctezuma had inherited.
These disadvantages notwithstanding the Aztecs walloped the
Spanish and their allies. The Spanish called their retreat from
Tenochtitlan the Night of Sorrows. The
slaughter was considerable.
The Spanish and their allies would be back. The Aztecs simply lacked the strength to
finish the job. Try as they might. They
had lost too many men and were losing more by the day. Once they had boasted that they let Tlaxcala
survive purely as a source of war prisoners for sacrifice. Tlaxcala endures
yet.
Tenochtitlan fell after a most valiant defence. It was mainly
destroyed in the process. There is much
to the Guns, Germs and Steel argument, especially if you add horses. Even so, it is not hard to envisage how
different decisions by Moctezuma could have produced other results.
For a moment let us imagine an early decisive Aztec
victory. Fought outside of Tenochtitlan by a full strength Aztec Army. The Spanish dead or captured. Their
Tlaxcala allies chastened in defeat and now ravaged by disease. Perhaps too, civil war, for there was an
anti-Spanish faction.
Disease, given Aztec prisoner practice, would have come to
Tenochtitlan. So though would have steel
weapons, crossbows, metal armour and horses.
Less centralised polities than the Aztecs managed to do an awful lot
with those things.
The last image on this page is by Diego Rivera. If you don't know his work, check it out. There is much to enjoy.