There is the mechanism in COTLB to replicate the impact of a dashing British Cavalry Charge. Here it is:
“ (a) Plus 3 British Cavalry in line or double line
attacking Russian Cavalry.
“ (b) Plus 2 For cavalry charging or counter
charging in double line (lines within 4” of each other). Russian attack
column striking infantry or artillery straight on.
This very much reflects the mythology of the Crimean War and
is fine if that’s what you want. If you want the history version here is mine:
“ (a) Plus 3 Lancer Cavalry in line or double line attacking
in the first round only. A plus 2 for
Heavy Cavalry fighting Light Cavalry in first and second rounds only.
“ (b) Plus 2 For cavalry charging or counter
charging in double line (lines within 4” of each other). Russian attack
column striking infantry or artillery straight on.
Now, what haven't I done? There's irregular cavalry, a big topic. Then the fascinating information that horses are much happier going uphill than downhill! Everyday is a school day.
I will have to think through the Irregular Cavalry thing. The uphill horses info' intrigues me. Cavalry +1 Charging uphill? Here I note Scarlett's Cavalry moved uphill.
One more thing. It was not uncommon for the first rank of a cavalry unit to carry lances while the second carried a sabre. The Russians sometimes did this. The idea being the Lancers broke the enemy formation and the sabre armed troopers exploited the chaos.
Next time in the Crimea we will look at the COTLB Infantry Rules. Some clever stuff there.
Also Robert Kershaw’s book 24 Hours at Balaclava has some interesting observations about the British infantry. We will consider the physical condition of the men and the long term impact of flogging.
Lovely looking cavalry OB, all look really good. A very interesting read too, look forward to the next post.
ReplyDeleteThanks Donnie. I feel all my research is coming together on this one.
DeleteBeautiful looking cavalry sir!
ReplyDeleteThanks Michal. I need 5 more figures and all is done.
DeleteGreat looking cavalry.
ReplyDeleteThanks Richard and the Light Brigade is finally complete!
DeleteWill have to check why horses prefer going uphill, but a little riding convinced me it is much easier for the rider. Not a great equestrian, I rode in hilly terrain some years back. When going uphill, the horse's wide butt is underneath and in back of you, a very firm platform. Going downhill, the horse's front "shoulders" are narrow, the neck even more so. Unlike metal figures, the neck tends to move from side to side or even down, out of reach. Lean back in the saddle as the distance to the ground becomes clear, nothing but your grip with the legs to keep you up.
ReplyDeleteThere was a figure review website years back called Spanner and the Yank. One of the two was a serious equestrian and promoted the idea that cavalry preferred going uphill.
That's interesting about the fellow on Spanner and the Yank. It was Adrian Goldsworthy who mentioned the horses liking to go up hill in a recent podcast. He admits to being no Comanche on horseback. Likewise myself too. Anyhow AG thinks it is just how horses are made. It is more comfortable for them to move up hill.
ReplyDeleteI remember what you are saying about riding downhill and leaning back and gripping with the thighs. Of course you couldn't lean back too much.
Not sure about +1 for cavalry going uphill, but certainly no bonus for going downhill!
ReplyDeleteNor me, it is interesting all the same and certainly no bonus going down hill.
ReplyDelete