The interaction with the Roman Empire had a marked effect on the Irish and Ireland. A range of loan words entered the Irish language. Nearly all of them were military terms related to warfare. Sections of the Irish elite were establishing themselves in Britannia in association with the Roman military. As part of this process, or, before it, the Irish elite took a keen interest in the Roman Army.
The Iron Age Irish sword had been short, sharp and pointed, optimal
for thrusting. It was called a colg.
A new sword with a new name entered the Irish lexicon. It was longer and made for both stabbing and
cutting . Its name was a loan word claideb
from the British word for sword. The British
word was presumably describing Roman swords. The Irish shield was of
rectangular shape at the time. It began
to be replaced by a circular shield quite small by Roman standards.
Taken together this suggests a very mobile slashing and
stabbing style of fighting. The warrior
would rely on skill, strength and speed to overcome his opponent. It is interesting to note that when longer
Roman sword blades were exported to Ireland they were modified to meet the
Irish preference. The small metal bossed shield could also be used
offensively. This could be done by hitting with the boss and also (as the Scéla note) by striking with the edge. The rest of the warrior’s
equipment consisted of a handful of light javelins (gae) and a spear (sleg). The latter often had a characteristic door knob spear butt. We will look at the distribution of archeological finds of these spear butts in Britannia in a subsequent post.
The spear butts were hollow and likely the same of those
recorded by Cassius Dio among the Caledonians.
“a short spear, with a bronze apple
attached to the end of the spear-shaft, so that when it is
shaken it may clash and terrify the enemy.”
It is possible for us to imagine an Irish warrior array rattling
their spears to create a psychological edge over their foes. Then, they would swiftly advance under a storm of hurled
javelins to stab and cut at close quarters.
Their fighting style must have been aggressive as their equipment and
lack of armour* precluded effective static defence. The nearest Roman comparison might be the
units of Lanciarii
who were lightly equipped and trained in aggressive tactics.
The proximity of the Empire was also increasing social
division in Ireland. The earliest Ogham stones often proclaim both the name and the tribe of the honorand. Later this gives way to dynastic
proclamations. The tribes of Ireland
were coming under the control of aggressive warrior dynasties who named themselves
as sons (Uí) or grandsons (Síl) of their martial pro-generator. This process was a direct result of the Irish
-Roman interaction. Some of these
dynasties would establish themselves in Britannia.
Some scholars think there was a sartorial dimension to the
process. They see the Irish elite as
emulating elite Roman dress. If you like - a
case of Níall na Noígíallach where’s your troosers? In this view the Irish elite now go bare
legged in tunics and cloaks. The rank
and file Irish tribesman still wore the traditional outfit. We can note that some Roman loan words
relating to clothing colours enter the Irish language at this time.
Jim Mallory expended a great deal of scholarly energy in analysing
the data contained in the Táin bo Cuailgne. Alongside much other fascinating information he
notes the following cloak colours worn by elite Irishmen: black, dark grey, dun coloured, green, grey, multi
coloured, red, striped, purple and yellow.
Significantly, the Imperial cult of Christianity began to
accrue Irish adherents. After a
protracted, if apparently pacific, struggle it came to predominate in Ireland. The immediate catalyst for this was the missionary
activities of the Romano British. The
victory was a long time coming but in the process the leading Druid section of the
Irish intellectual elite (Na Fíli) were displaced or converted. As a consequence today our understanding of
the old Celtic religion is extremely fragmentary. A partial exception to this is Ireland’s
pagan warrior cult of the Féinid where we can attempt a minimal
reconstruction.
The transformations arising from the Irish-Roman interactions
were not unique. On every frontier of the Roman Empire similar processes were
at work. These relationships were
regularly interrupted by extreme violence as one side or the other sought to
adjust the balance of power. For the
Irish-Roman one the crisis came in 367-8 AD.
* The current consensus is that the Irish in our period didn't use armour. Scéla references to leather protection are thought to be literary borrowings. That may be so. Yet, we can note the honorand of the early Welsh poem Trawsganu Kynan led a raid into Irish Dyfed and took as part of the loot, "30 Irish battle coats". Clearly, this was some type of armour. It was thought valuable, worthy of bardic mention and specifically Irish. Possibly, the Scéla had it right.
* The current consensus is that the Irish in our period didn't use armour. Scéla references to leather protection are thought to be literary borrowings. That may be so. Yet, we can note the honorand of the early Welsh poem Trawsganu Kynan led a raid into Irish Dyfed and took as part of the loot, "30 Irish battle coats". Clearly, this was some type of armour. It was thought valuable, worthy of bardic mention and specifically Irish. Possibly, the Scéla had it right.
No comments:
Post a Comment