Never Mind The Billhooks (NMTBH) by Andy
Callan is a stand alone rule set for the Wars of the Roses. Andy has a long pedigree in producing
interesting period gaming rules. These
include Dark Age Infantry Slog and Loose Files and American Scabbles for the
AWI/Revolutionary War.
Wargames Illustrated September 2020 issue 393
included a free copy of NMTBH which is why I bought it. No doubt others did too. A shrewd bit of marketing there.
NMTBH includes everything you need to play
bar the D6 dice and the toys. So, what do
you get? You get the full colour
illustrated rule book and cards and tokens ditto. The latter are both very nicely done.
Now, the paper is flimsy and you will need
to mount or protect your cards and tokens to ensure longevity. My tokens got glued to mdf round bases and
given a coat of varnish. The cards went
into self sealing plastic wallets. By
now you will have realised I’m pleased and impressed with NMTBH.
NMTBH is intended for large skirmishes or
small battles. More tangibly, the author
suggests 100 figures or so a side. These
are divided into three ’wards’ as you might expect for the period. Units contain 12 figures for foot, 6 for
skirmishers and 8 for cavalry.
Troops can be optionally levy costing less or veterans costing more.
Troops can be optionally levy costing less or veterans costing more.
Each ward should contain a minimum of two
units. These can be Bill, Bow, Pikes or
Men at Arms. Archers can be combined with other solid foot to produce a handier
‘super’ unit that’s easier to control.
There are other troop types too. Artillery,
Hand Gunners, Kern and Crossbows are all catered for.
Cavalry come as either men at arms or
plain cavalry, currours and similar.
There are a couple of nice touches in
NMTBH. Archers have only 6 volleys in
them and mounted Men at Arms only 2 full on charges. Good period flavour and a clear injunction to
try a little generalship if you hope to win.
The mechanisms for shooting and close
combat follow a well trodden path. A
full unit of 12 Archers shoots with 12 dice.
At short range they have a better chance of hitting. Their targets can attempt a saving
throw. Chances of a save increase with
armour. Nothing new here but it is all
clearly thought out and works well.
Ditto Melee, Mounted Men at Arms get to
dice per figure, foot Men at Arms 1.5 dice per figure, likewise Currours. Bills, Pikes and Kerns get 1 dice a figure and
Archers and Skirmishers 1 dice for every 2 figures. You get the picture, re-rolls for the quality
and armour or veteran status helps saving throws. It is all nicely balanced. There’s single combat for commanders too. Refuse the latter at your peril.
The motor of the game is a card deck
activating either side, Skirmishers or introducing a special event or advantage. It’s a system that holds the players
attention without dominating the game.
Commanders have to be active. When their card comes up the issue a
flurry of orders, directing shooting, rallying waverers and leading the
fighting. They do this by issuing order
tokens or simply getting stuck in. Commander quality can differ.
Attrition effects function and units who
have had a set back get a ‘Daunted’ or ‘Disarray’ marker. These need to be attended to.
Every time a side gets into trouble it has
to hand over a morale token. The number of tokens is determined by how many non
skirmishing or artillery units fielded.
The side that has to hand over all its morale tokens is beat. The
other way to win is simply to kill your opponents General.
The Irish Addendum follows below. It’s really because NMTBH will provide me
with a use for a lot of surplus figures.
That said it might be of use to others too. Certainly you could use NMTBH to re-fight the
Battle of Piltown or Knockdoe. I’d say
it would work for Flodden too.
Type
|
Points
per figure
|
Move
(Charge)
|
Shoot
|
Melee
x D6 per figure
|
Save
|
Notes
|
Irish
Horse
|
1.5
|
10 (14)
|
6
|
1.5
|
5,6
|
Save:4,5,6
in Melee
|
Gallóglaich
|
1.5
|
6
(8)
|
-
|
2
|
4,5,6
|
Better
than Bills in Melee, faster too in a charge.
Disadvantaged against Men at Arms.
|
The Irish Horse won’t be battle winners
but will be handy enough. The
Gallóglaich will “Swiftly slay or be slain” just as we are told they did. I’ll be making mine ‘Veteran’ too, expensive,
but then again they were.
I could say more positive things about NMTBH but I won’t. It’s a quality product and eminently
affordable and adaptable.
They sound an interesting set of rules. I'll go check the mag!
ReplyDeleteCertainly worth getting If you can't get one Arcane Scenery will sell you post free.
ReplyDeleteSweet!
DeleteInteresting rules and immediately reminded my of Lion Rampant, but with some clever additions.
ReplyDeleteYeah, all that. The advantage of being period specific I think.
ReplyDeleteIt looks like a good ruleset, I think I'll have to get it!
ReplyDeleteBest Iain
Hi Iain, the more I get into these rules the better a like them. I don't think you will be disappointed.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comprehensive and very positive review of my rules. Your Irish additions are interesting because I have just written a Stoke Field scenario for Billhooks (for the next Wargames Illustrated)and the stats you have given the Gallowglasses (I can't be doing with Irish orthography...too easy to get it wrong!)are virtually the same as mine - One and a half points each and save for 4/5/6.However your bhoys are going to be tough cookies indeed on 2D6 per figure in Melee(I gave them only one and a half, like Men at Arms). I think Knockdoe would make a great scenario for Billhooks with the native Irish troop types and the Anglo-Irish Palesmen so I'd be interesting to see a battle report if you do it. Cheers, Andy Callan
ReplyDeleteLovely to hear from you Andy.
ReplyDeleteI think my 2 is a typo, I don't think they were better than Men at Arms. The same hitting power but less well armoured. Consequently they will die quicker but charge faster.
Currently I'm frantically trying to put together Lancastrian and Yorkist forces. Half way through Percy's retinue at the moment.
Thanks for writing these rules. I doubt I'd have got into the WOTR if you hadn't.
There will be more 'Billhooks' here as I progress.
Agree with your warm welcome to these rules, there is much to enjoy and some of the goodness really only comes out during play.
ReplyDeleteI am Ok with the Knights. There are only 8 of them and they can only charge twice. In both of my games, they have been roughly handled, so the balance seems ok at this point.
Hi Norm, I have been following your blog reports of games of Billhooks with interest. It all looks good.
ReplyDeleteWargames Illustrated are so pleased with the response to Billhooks that they want to do a follow-up publication, along the lines of the one of the Black powder expansions. The idea is to take the game further afield within a roughly 1400-1525 western european framework. As one of the very first gamers to "get" what i was about with the game ould you be interested in contributing a "Billhooks Hibernia" chapter? Basically, Billhooks in Ireland - so a bit of history, some extra troop types, points, special rules etc and a scenario. I would like to keep this under the radar for now so if you are interested please coantact me via email at andy.callan.ntlworld.com and I can fill you in on what might be in it for you. cheers, Andy
ReplyDeleteor even better, to andy.callan@ntlworld.com
DeleteI'll certainly do that Andy.
ReplyDelete